| |
In one of the lectures he gave in this country Swami Vivekananda
said, "A sannyasin cannot belong to any religion, for his
is a life of independent thought, which draws from all religions;
his is a life of realization, not merely of theory or belief,
much less of dogma." Even to call Vivekananda a "Vedantist"
is to put a label on him unjustly.
What, then, do we mean by the Vedanta of Sankaracharya or
of Ramanuja or of any other acharya?
We mean the emphasis, something indicated by
the Sanskrit word darshana, the outlook special to that
particular person. We wish to outline and discuss here some nine
salient points which could be considered the special features
of Swamiji's Vedanta.
Before we do that, let us first point out what seem to be
mistakes often made in approaching the life and thought of Swamiji.
If we can first clear the ground of these mistaken preconceptions,
our step into Vivekananda-land will be more sure.
1) That he was at times unfaithful to what Sri Ramakrishna
taught: his message seems to be quite different.
Reply: in the first place, the Master never
told Narendra that he was to be a "clone" of himself.
He often stood in awe of the height and breadth of his disciple's
mind. Secondly it must be remembered that they had very different
audiences. Ramakrishna spoke to the western-educated, but still
very Indian in background, Calcutta residents, whereas Vivekananda
addressed crowds of Americans and Europeans, products of the
Renaissance, of science and of western philosophy and theology.
In Vedanta the message is guided by the nature of the recipients.
2) That Swamiji got his humanism, socialism, organizing methods
etc. from his experience in the West.
Reply: by reading his life in detail one soon
discovers that he was studying, and thinking about the ideas
of Hamilton, Herbert Spencer, Tyndall, T.H. Huxley and others
and how to use them, long before he left for the West. He was,
even in his college days, familiar with philosophers like Hume
and Hegel, and an avid reader of John Stuart Mill.
3) That he was "only" the Master's messenger, not a
spiritual power in himself.
Reply: Nothing could be further from the fact.
Sri Ramakrishna gave him the power accumulated
by his own sadhana, on one fateful day at Dakshineswar, remarking
afterwards, "Now I have become a mere fakir." Swamiji
too, challenged by one of his brother-disciples, declared unequivocally,
"While I am on earth Sri Ramakrishna is working through
me, have no doubt."
Now let us turn to what I would call Vivekananda's most significant
and distinctive teachings.
We shall put them under nine headings:
That truth is Brahman alone
This differs a bit from Sankara's "Brahman alone is real;
the world is false." Swami Vivekananda said that the greatest
name man ever gave to God was Truth. "My mission,"
he explained to an interviewer in London, "is to show that
religion is in everything and is everything." He told us
that drama and music and art are by themselves religion; that
any song, love song or whatever, will lead to liberation if one's
whole soul is in that song.
Most surprisingly, he said "I am a materialist in a certain
sense, because I believe that there is only One. That is what
the materialist wants you to believe; only he calls it matter
and I call it God, Brahman." He knew from his own experience,
when, after the touch of his Master, he went into the streets
and saw that everything before him was God.
So much for nature. As for the soul, "There is only one
individual," he said, "and each of us is That."
Atman is Brahman.
The ultimate realization is identity with Brahman
Here he shows himself the orthodox Advaitan. No compromise
can be accepted. "Stop not until the goal is reached,"
he urged. What is the goal? That pure identity, attained only
by fearlessness, which is why he talked so much of fearlessness.
"That God, for whom you have been searching all over the
universe is all the time yourself -- your self, not in the personal
sense but in the Impersonal." And when others appealed to
Ramakrishna that this sounded like egotism, the latter replied,
"Naren can say that."
"The eternal, the infinite, the omnipresent, the omniscient
is a principle, not a Person. You, I and everyone are but embodiments
of that principle and more of it is embodied in a person, the
greater is he, and all in the end will be the
perfect embodiment of that, and thus all will be one, as they
are now essentially..." He told us we are born monists;
we cannot help it, because we always perceive the One.
All paths are grounded in Advaita and fulfilled in it
This is what will prevent us from being fanatics: that man
goes not from error to truth, but from lower truth to higher
truth. When Swamiji spoke about Sri Krishna and the Gita he cautioned,
"You must worship the Self in Krishna, not Krishna as Krishna."
He shows the all-inclusive nature of Advaita when he says that
it accepts dualism and all systems that preceded Advaita. This
is the universal solvent into which all philosophies must merge
at last. This is not "inclusive-ism" nor triumphalism
as is sometimes alleged. Just see: "Without the Vedanta
every religion is superstition (including 'Hinduism'); with it
everything becomes religion."
Religion should be presented rationally
This is just what Swami Vivekananda did in his speeches at
the Parliament of Religions in Chicago in 1893. It captivated
the audience, which was tired of emotional harangues from sectarian
prelates. Vedanta of all persuasions has always prescribed shravanam,
manamam, nididhyâsanam -- hearing the truth, mulling
it over, and meditating upon it; here was Vivekananda telling
us not just about his own faith, but about all faiths. Had anyone
done this in this way before? "If one religion be true,"
he pointed out, then all the others must be true." "What
happened once in history must happen again..." That was
the scientific attitude. He said that the study of religion can
and should be pursued on exactly the same basis as the pursuit
of any other science. "Everything religion claims must be
judged from the standpoint of reason," and when people replied
that human reason was weak, he told them "a body of priests
would be even weaker!" He dared to say to his own disciples
at the head monastery in India, "Only those portions of
the Vedas which agree with reason are to be accepted as authority,"
and also warned them, regarding the Guru, "Worship your
Guru as God, but do not obey him blindly; love him all you will,
but think for yourself."
All truths should be made available to all people
"What I want to propagate," Swamiji said, in his
lecture "The Ideal of a Universal Religion," "is
a religion that will be equally acceptable to all minds; it must
be equally philosophic, equally emotional, equally mystic and
equally conducive to action... and this ideal will be the nearest
approach to a universal religion." Particularly he dinned
this into the ears of his fellow Indians. "The most wonderful
truths confined in our Upanishads, in our Puranas, must be brought
out from the books, brought out from the monasteries, from the
forests, from the possession of selected bodies of people and
scattered broadcast over the land, so that these truths run like
fire, all over the country." "Advaita," he said,
..."shall no more be a secret... it must come down to the
everyday life of the people." It has to enter the palace,
come from the cave to the cottage, to the beggar -- everywhere.
The oppressed -- the outcast and the woman were to fear no longer.
"Let the new India arise, from the man who grasps the plough,
from the huts of the fisherman, the cobbler, the sweeper..."
And in London he made this prediction: "The power of religion,
broadened and purified, is going to penetrate every part of human
life ... it will live in our every movement, penetrate every
pore of our society, and be infinitely more a power for good
than it has ever been before."
Everyone should embody all phases of truth
By this the Swami did not mean that there would no longer
be specialists: he meant no more exclusiveness. What the age
needs is the all-rounded person. "Would to God," he
said, that all the elements of philosophy, mysticism, emotion
and work were equally present in full! That is my ideal of the
perfect person. Everyone else ...is one-sided, and this world
is almost full with these 'one-sided' people, with knowledge
of the one road only in which they move; anything else is dangerous
and horrible to them. To become harmoniously balanced in all
these directions is my ideal of religion." On rare occasions
he would point to his Master as the example of this: e.g., "It
was given to me," he told the Madrasis, "to live with
a man who was as ardent a dualist, as ardent an Advaitin, as
ardent a bhakta, as a jñâni Swamiji fortunately
provided his own fine example: another such well-rounded prophet
is difficult to discover. He was a master at stating accurately
the views of another. He was a musician, and in the West took
lessons in painting and in the French language. "We are
of a new type," he told his listeners; "sometimes dressed
like gentlemen, we are engaged in lecturing; at other times,
throwing all aside ...ash-clad, we are immersed in meditation
and austerities in mountains and forests." This same idea
he applied to the form his work was to take: "I haven't
been born," Swamiji remarked, "to found one more sect
in a world teeming with sects."
All paths are to be made active in the service of man as
God
Suppose we want to do charitable work; in that case what Swami
Vivekananda tells us is: "Never approach anything except
as God." "It is our privilege to be allowed to be charitable,
for only so can we grow. The poor suffer that we may be helped;
let the giver kneel down and give thanks, let the receiver stand
up and permit." "Feel that the receiver is the higher
one. You serve the other because you are lower than he, not because
he is low and you are high." The relation of all this to
the overcoming of ego is obvious. "Philosophy and yoga and
penance... --all these constitute the religion of one person
or one country; doing good to others is the one great universal
religion." Swamiji told his own disciples, "Know this
for certain: he who will work will be the crown on my head."
"What is India, or England or America to us? We are the
servants of that God who by the ignorant is called MAN."
Now if this activity of service is to be expressed through all
paths, then we are again reminded of our first point: that drama,
music and art are by themselves religion. What Vivekananda preached
he carried out. In his lecture to an American audience in San
Francisco, entitled "Is Vedanta the Future Religion",
he confided: "You are the Personal God. Just now I am worshipping
you (in speaking). This is the greatest prayer."
That man-making was his religion
What does he mean by a man? A human being, of course. "Great
men," Swamiji said, "are those who build bridges for
others with their heart's blood." That was the austerity
for this age, not so much the forest penances and meditations,
but the building of character through karma yoga,
is what is needed today. What India in particular now wanted
was "muscles of iron and nerves of steel", which nothing
could resist, which could penetrate the mysteries of the universe,
and accomplish their purpose in any fashion, even if meant going
down to the bottom of the ocean and meeting death face to face.
Quoting or paraphrasing some verse of poetry he said, "We
shall crush the stars to atoms and unhinge the universe. Don't
you know who we are? We are the servants of Sri Ramakrishna!"
One can sometimes feel that Swamiji's God was Man; "Read
Man," he said, "he is the living poem." It is
not humanism.
It has a much larger definition.
Worship the Terrible
This, in a way, is the most "personal" of these
distinctive accents in the message of Vivekananda. He used to
say, when speaking of Kali, that She, whom at first he could
not accept, had become the Power that now moved him. "Two
or three days before Sri Ramakrishna's passing away She whom
he used to call 'Kali' entered this body. It is She who takes
me here and there and makes me work... I feel that that Power
is constantly directing me." Aside from being personal to
him, how is it an injunction for all of us? "Each is responsible
for the evil anywhere in the world." No one can really "shut
the door where evil dwells"; everyone has to face, eventually,
that Being whose hands hold good and bad, sweetness and terror.
She, the even-handed Mother, was the chosen Ideal of Ramakrishna,
and Swami Vivekananda had to make out the significance of it
and carry this to the world. "Worship the Terrible,"
meant for him and us, no fear even of death; to see in the world
of today the tremendous play of energy, showing its splendors
in every way, understanding it as the Power of Brahman Itself.
Aum
| About | Calendar
| Articles | Stories
| On-line books
Bulletin board | Books
& tapes | Links | Search
| Contact
|